The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The examination of the summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the court below is unfair as it is too unfasible.

The sentence of the lower court (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

A favorable normal defendant shows the appearance of reflecting the confession of crime, there is no record of criminal punishment, and efforts to delete the spreading notices are favorable to the defendant.

The instant notice posted by the Defendant on the Internet block, along with the victim’s photograph, was edited by the head of several hundreds of female body pictures (including sexually exposed photographs) of non-victims, which are non-victims.

In front and rear of the victim's photograph, the victim's balone-day and attitude are similar to those of the victim's balone-day and the face of the victim's balone-way is limited to only a part of the victim's face, and the general public seems to be the same female and the victim.

Defendant I would like to move to the above notice “I Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok-do to Korea.”

요즘 하드에 빠져서 ㅋㅋㅋ”, “ 진심 어린 발 정녀 ㅎㅎ 싸랑해 자기야”, “ 최근 근황 ㅋㅋㅋ 이번에 스페인 가서 스페인 남자 한명이랑 섹 파 했습 니 돠~ 요즘 너무 정액을 좋아해 가지고 ㅎㅎ” 라는 말을 덧붙였다.

The Defendant, like the victim’s male-child arrest, opened a black picture in the name similar to the actual male-child address of the victim (which means 508,509 pages of the evidence record), and thereby, up to credibility in the written indictment on the notices (which means 143 pages of the evidence record). Accordingly, when viewed by another person, the Defendant prepared a photo of the instant notices in the victim’s body as well as the attached letters in the victim’s family-friendly manner.

It is highly likely that there is a high possibility to believe.

In this case, the defendant suffered damage.