1. All of the plaintiffs' claims that have been changed in exchange in the trial are dismissed.

2. The plaintiffs' total costs of litigation.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the following parts and the part concerning which the Plaintiffs asserted or additionally claimed in the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(2) In addition, the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiffs’ assertion, even if the Plaintiffs’ assertion was examined in the first instance court and the first instance court, and all of the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the first instance court were examined, the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiffs’ assertion is justifiable).

From February 11, 2019 to August 10, 2019, the term of prohibition of departure on February 18, 2019 was extended again from February 11, 2019 to December 18, 2019 (hereinafter the above disposition of February 18, 2019) of the first instance judgment, “The term of prohibition of departure on August 14, 2019 was extended again from August 11, 2019 to February 10, 2020” (hereinafter the above disposition of August 14, 2019).

Part 2 of the judgment of the first instance, "A through 3, 18, 18, 1, 1, 21, 1, 2, 1, 1, 18, 1, 18, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 18.

The grounds of the first instance judgment No. 4

B. Paragraph 3 (3) (No. 4 of the judgment of the first instance) was disposed of by auction or public sale, and partly delinquent amount was repaid. However, Plaintiff A paid the total amount of KRW 200 million on October 31, 2019 after the sentence of the first instance judgment, and Plaintiff B paid the delinquent amount. Plaintiff B paid the delinquent amount.