1. The Defendant’s KRW 23,228,418 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from July 31, 2017 to October 24, 2019.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. At around 10:40 on July 31, 2017, the Defendant has a dispute with regard to the transfer of the business report certificate of the “C” telecom owned by the Plaintiff in front of the so-called “C” tele-gu, So-gu, So-gu, So-young-ro 8-ro.

격분하여 우산으로 원고의 윗목을 1회 �리고 손으로 가슴을 1회 밀쳐 원고에게 3주간의 치료가 필요한 경추 염좌 및 긴장의 상해를 가하였다

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

On July 31, 2017, the day of the instant accident, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in D Hospital and discharged on August 20, 2017, after treating injuries, such as light signboards, signs, disorders, etc. accompanied by nephal ppuri disease certificates, and thereafter, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the relevant D Hospital on September 12, 2017 and discharged on September 19, 2017, due to the injury, such as “the ebrate of wooden signboards,” etc. during the period of treatment conducted by the Dapary Hospital on August 30, 2017.

C. On December 14, 2017, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million around the Cheongju District Court 2017 High Court Decision 201Da8755, and around that time, the summary order became final and conclusive.

The physical appraisal agency of this case responded to the Plaintiff’s physical evaluation that “a light signboard accompanied by the Plaintiff’s nephical disease” is a complex cause of a elimic change and accident, and there is no rash that can be confirmed on the records of “medical records.” The escape symptoms of the conical disease can be fundamentalized or aggravated due to the outbreak or aggravation of symptoms. However, even though the external history of the instant accident is not significant, the possibility of entirely excluding the possibility can not be determined. In the event of a light signboard disease prior to the instant accident, the rate of contribution to the accident is 40%.”

[Ground of recognition] The absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 5, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including, if any, any), the result of physical promotional assessment to the E Hospital Head of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Liability for damages.