logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2019.06.13 2019고단267
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by a year of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident after Accidents) are those engaged in driving cars Btota RV4.

On August 16, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed of 0.065% with alcohol concentration of 0.065% around 01:30 on August 16, 2018, and driven the front road of the “D” located in the north-gu C at the port of the port at a speed that would not be known by one lane in the direction of the Masan-ri distance.

At the time, there are nights, and there are a yellow-ray centering line, so the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to look at the front line and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and to accurately operate the steering system, and to safely drive the motor vehicle along the upper right and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in running along the center line with the Defendant’s negligence, and the part on the left left side of the Defendant’s car operated by the victim E (the aged 64) who was driving in the direction of interesting navigation from the direction of Masan History to the direction of interesting navigation from the direction of the Defendant’s adjacent part of the Masan taxi vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt ties, tensions, etc. in need of treatment for about three weeks, and at the same time, escaped without immediately stopping the said taxi vehicle and taking necessary measures, such as providing rescue to the victim, even though it damages the 2,273,296 won to the left-hand side.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the H’s front road located in North-gu G at a temporary border under paragraph (1) to the J coffee shop in North-gu G at the same time, the Defendant driven a B RaV4 car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 15 km from the 15km section to the G coffee shop in the same Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow