logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2020.11.13 2019가합103464
임금
Text

1. The defendant attached Form to the plaintiffs

1. The term “official fee sheet” refers to each of the pertinent money and each of the said money recorded.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is a local public enterprise established on October 13, 201 pursuant to the Local Public Enterprises Act and the Ordinance on the Establishment and Operation of the Facilities Management Corporation in the astronomical City with the aim of contributing to the promotion of the welfare of citizens by efficiently managing and operating facilities and projects entrusted by the astronomical City Mayor.

B. The Plaintiffs are converted to a inorganic contract worker employed by the Defendant as of January 1, 2012, or employed as a public servant (inorganic contract worker) worker after January 1, 2012, following consultation with the Inananan City after the establishment of the Defendant, under the former status of the contract worker employed by the Defendant in the position of the contract worker employed in the previous astronomic.

C. In paying bonuses calculated at 400% per annum to the Plaintiffs, the Defendant paid 100% of the basic salary in March, June, September, and December each year until 2018, and paid 1/3 of the basic salary every month from 2019.

From March 2016, the Defendant paid extension allowances, holiday allowances, holiday extension allowances, holiday night allowances, and holiday and night allowances (hereinafter “each of the instant allowances”) to the Plaintiffs from March 2016, the Defendant calculated and paid them by including only 100% of the ordinary wages as the basis for the calculation.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap 2 through 10, Eul 6's each entry, the purport of whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. Although the entire bonus calculated at 400% per annum falls under ordinary wages, the defendant allegedly paid to the plaintiffs each of the allowances of this case calculated by including only the amount equivalent to 100% of the bonus as ordinary wages. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiffs the unpaid amount of each of the allowances of this case including all of the bonus as ordinary wages and damages for delay thereof.

B. The Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant had received consent from individual workers around February 2016, and on February 16, 2016, held a labor-management council and held a meeting for indefinite contract workers and fixed-term workers on February 16, 2016, is limited to 10% of meal subsidies and bonuses.

arrow