logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.08.14 2013고정166
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 1, 2012, the Defendant, as the father of E, who attended the Seoglbuk-gun D University D University C, was dissatisfied with the above school’s work by force as follows, on the ground that the professor of D University did not properly deal with his sexual intercourses and sexual intercourses with female students.

1. On May 1, 2012, the Defendant called D University located in Seoglbuk-gun C at around 10:0 to 14:00 and obstructed the victim’s school affairs by bringing to the victim F, who is an employee of the principal school, “I will only be aware of scars’ work, and will to be known to the Office of Education at the Prosecutor’s Office of Education.”

2. Around 12:00 on May 22, 2012, the Defendant made phone calls to the pertinent D University, and obstructed the victim G, an employee of the school, who is a school principal, with the content of “the victim G, who is affiliated with the representative telephone call, comes out, and she is not in distress,” or interfered with the victim’s school affairs.

3. At around 16:30 on May 23, 2012, the Defendant called the said D University and received a civil petition from the victim G, who is an educational staff member of the said D University, “The Defendant received the civil petition at the Cheongdae Examination and the Teaching Examination,” and the Defendant expressed a desire to the contents of “the content, etc., or interfered with the victim’s school affairs by taking a high character.”

4. At around 15:30 on May 31, 2012, the Defendant called the said D University to take a bath to the victim G, who is an educational staff member of the D University, including, but not limited to, “a final notification and entry into a civil petition,” or interfered with the victim’s school affairs by taking advantage of high character.

5. On August 14, 2012, at the end of 14:00, the Defendant made phone calls to the said D University, and expressed the victim H, a school principal employee, “No measure is taken at school. In addition, the Ministry of Education and the Cheongdae shall make a petition to the Ministry of Education and the Cheongdae,” or interfere with the victim’s school affairs.

6. On September 7, 2012, the Defendant called the victim G, who is an employee of the school, by calls from the above D University on September 7, 2012, such as “the shift of the president.”

arrow