Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
District Court 2014Guhap7409
Title
Income earned from the Housing Construction and Sales Business Act with continuity and repetition to the extent that business activities can be seen as business income.
Summary
(As with the judgment of the court of first instance) If real estate transactions have been conducted as a whole with continuity and repetition under the business purpose, it constitutes a business operator's real estate transactions, and income accrued therefrom constitutes business income, and the exclusion period for imposition of ten years is ten years.
Related statutes
Article 2 of the Value-Added Tax Act
Cases
2014Nu71803. Revocation of imposition, including value-added tax
Plaintiff
IsaA
Defendant
00. Head of tax office
Conclusion of Pleadings
July 3, 2015
Imposition of Judgment
September 11, 2015
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. Each disposition of the Defendant rendered against the Plaintiff on July 16, 2013, including global income tax of KRW 000, global income tax of KRW 000, global income tax of KRW 000 for the second year of the same year and value-added tax of KRW 000 for the first year of 2006 shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;
This judgment is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition of the following matters, and thus, it is based on Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(1) On the fourth page, the following shall be added to "the fact reported and paid":
[In addition, the Plaintiff appears to use the phrase "a sales contract in the construction process of the building" in the sales contract for the first and second houses in order to conceal it even though it was transferred to the Plaintiff, and the expression "a newly constructed building" in the sales contract for the second houses (Article 22-1).
(2) On the 12th 10th 10, "the 2003th 2005 portion" means "the 2004th 2004, 2006 portion"
Ro-friendly.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.