logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2016.06.28 2016고정30
산림자원의조성및관리에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Any person shall obtain permission from the head of a Si/Gun/Gu or the head of a local forest office to cut standing timber in a forest.

The Defendant, without obtaining permission from the competent authority, called C, a branchr located in the same Dong Dong Dongdong-gun, as a tree cuter in the forest land located in the former North Chang-gun, and C equally cut the trees from May 22, 2015 to May 25, 2015 without obtaining permission from the competent authority.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with C, cut standing timber without obtaining permission from the competent authorities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and C;

1. The statement in C among the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the accused or C by the prosecution, or the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against C by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and C;

1. The defendant asserts to the effect that he did not deliver the horse of E, which is good to cut trees, and that he did not speak as such with the intent to cut standing trees without permission, and that he did not have any obligation to obtain permission from C, or that the defendant does not have any obligation to obtain permission. However, according to the above evidence, in particular, E and C’s statements, according to the above evidence, E, and C’s respective statements, E managing the above forest land, the defendant is to ensure that “When there is any person who is necessary to cut the trees increased by the field of high tide, it is necessary to cut the trees after applying for the damaged trees to cut the trees.”

Although the Defendant said to the effect that “,” the Defendant, “, by obtaining permission from the owner of an mountain village, is going back to a few of the mountain paths.”

“Absing to the effect that E will apply for a damaged item.”

Since it is recognized that the defendant should cut down trees planted in a place other than the designated date and time and place, the above assertion by the defendant is rejected.

Application of Statutes

1. Criminal facts;

arrow