beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
. Determination as to the cause of the claim
A. The plaintiff's primary assertion 1) The court had decided to suspend the performance of duties of the president of a cooperative from February 7, 2009 to November 7, 2010. The defendant union has the duty to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 101,95,640 won (=66, 510 won, 41, 289, 130 won) as the aggregate of the salaries, bonuses, retirement allowances, and retirement allowances as stated in the table 1, 101,95,640 won (i.e., 60, 600 won, 160 won, 200 won, 300 won, 160, 2000 won, 160 won, 206 won, 300,000 won, 200 won, 360,000 won, 360,000 won, 206 won, 360,000 won, 200 won.
hereinafter the same shall apply.
()* 66,60 won of retirement allowance ¡¿ 4,66,650 won in 21 month 】 [2,66,60 won in 2.6 million won in 2.66 million won in 2.66 million won in 206,660] / 21 month in 12 months smallest 60,66,510 won in 2: From June 18, 2013 to May 31, 2014 (28,583, 300 won in 2.5 million won in 2.5 million won in 2.5 million won in 2.5 million won in 2.5 million won in 2.5 million won in 2.5 million won in 2.5 million won in 30 million won in 2.5 million won in 203,630 won in 30 million won in 2.5.36 million won in 30 million won in 30 million won in 200 million won in 2.5.
(hereinafter the same shall apply)
(3) Retirement pay KRW 3,178,070 (3), 3,178,070 (3), 3,666,660 won per month, 86,660 won x 11 month) seems to be a clerical error in the amount of KRW 361,100. [13 days per month = 86,66,60 won x (13 days/ 30 days)]; [3,178,070 won per month, this seems to be a clerical error in the amount of KRW 3,33,330.
(i) The plaintiff could not have the "right to claim remuneration as the president of the cooperative" against the defendant cooperative by the plaintiff against the defendant cooperative, even though the plaintiff could not have the "right to claim remuneration as the president of the cooperative" during the above period, since the plaintiff's association made unjust enrichment of the amount equivalent to the remuneration for the defendant cooperative's labor provided to the defendant cooperative during the above period, and thus the defendant cooperative's association made unjust enrichment to the plaintiff for the above amount equivalent to the remuneration for the defendant cooperative's labor provided to the defendant cooperative.