1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) set to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 143,381,052 and the Plaintiff’s 106,199,96 out of them.

Basic Facts

On September 10, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with Defendant Company to work as a representative partner of the financial sector (hereinafter “instant contract”) with Defendant Company upon receiving remuneration of KRW 250 million per annum (20,833,333,000 per annum). The Plaintiff is registered as an internal director of the Defendant Company from around that time.

In December 2013, the retired person is the person who retired.

-Remuneration - The total base monthly salary of ear in accordance with the current monthly salary regulations of the Company shall be on the condition that 250 million won per year shall be paid monthly.

-The base monthly wage of return will be newly increased or decreased through consultations annually.

The Company - The Company is bound to provide you with the automobile sirens of one million and five hundred and fifty hundred thousand won per month, subject to the three-year recontract.

However, if you leave the company not later than three years before you leave the company, the remaining sirens under the rental contract are liable to you.

- Retirement pay program as our employee, in accordance with the Korean Labor Standards Act, will subscribe to the retirement pay program.

The program begins immediately after you become a member of the company, but the payment of retirement pay will take place after the lapse of the minimum period of time after the entry.

The main contents of the instant contract are as follows.

The Plaintiff was provided with a card from the Defendant Company to use the rental car and entertainment expenses, and used the card by the company.

The Defendant paid remuneration to the Plaintiff according to the aforementioned agreement until December 2012, but only a part of the Plaintiff’s remuneration was paid each month as shown in the attached Form from January 2013 to November 201.

In around 2013, the Defendant recommended the Plaintiff to endeavor by referring to the poor performance of the Plaintiff at a number of times, and recommended the Plaintiff to use unpaid leave, etc. on the ground that the Plaintiff did not have any urgent performance.

The plaintiff revealed his intention to resign to the defendant during the period of unpaid leave.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3.