logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.07.03 2014나2043807
이사보수
Text

1.Paragraph 1 of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance is amended as follows:

The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim).

Reasons

Basic Facts

On September 10, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the representative director H representing the Defendant Company to work as a representative director of the Defendant Company (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the amount of KRW 250 million per annum ( KRW 20,833,333 per annum), and thereafter registered as an internal director of the Defendant Company from around that time.

Around December 2013, 2013.

-Remunerations - the total base monthly salary of you under the current monthly salary regulations of the Company shall be 250,000 won per annum on a monthly basis, in accordance with the monthly salary regulations of the Company.

-The base monthly wage of return will be newly increased or decreased through consultations annually.

The Company - The Company will provide you with the automobile sirens of KRW 1.5 million per month as the terms of the three-year recontract.

However, if you leave the company not later than three years before you leave the company, the remaining sirens under the rental contract are liable to you.

- Retirement pay program as our employee, in accordance with the Korean Labor Standards Act, will subscribe to the retirement pay program.

The program begins immediately after you become a member of the company, but the payment of retirement pay will take place after the lapse of the minimum period of time after the entry.

The main contents of the instant contract are as follows.

The Plaintiff was provided with a card from the Defendant Company to use the rental car and entertainment expenses, and used the card by the company.

The Defendant paid remuneration to the Plaintiff pursuant to the instant contract up to December 2012, but only a part of the Plaintiff’s remuneration was paid each month from January 2013 to November 201 as shown in the attached Form.

Around 2013, the Defendant recommended the Plaintiff to make efforts by referring to the poor performance of the Plaintiff at a number of times, and recommended the Plaintiff to use unpaid leave, etc. on the ground that the Plaintiff did not have any urgent performance.

The plaintiff revealed his intention to resign to the defendant during the period of unpaid leave.

[Reasons for Recognition]

arrow