logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2013.06.05 2011나7949
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit claiming a loan against G (Ulsan District Court Decision 91Na9544, 94Ga6052), and H testified testified in the instant case. 2) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit claiming a loan (Ulsan District Court Decision 95Da14520, Ulsan District Court Decision 95Na6223) against B, and I testified in the instant case.

3) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against C and D seeking the return of the loan (Ulsan District Court Decision 91 Ghana9568), and J and K testified testified in the foregoing case. 4) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against E and F (Ulsan Branch Court 90 Ghana1433), and L testified in the foregoing case.

B. On September 18, 1996, the Plaintiff was sentenced one year and six months to imprisonment with prison labor in the Busan District Court Ulsan District Court in the following cases: (a) on September 18, 1996, the Plaintiff was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for non-prosecution in the following cases: H, I, J, K, K, and L for the purpose of having a criminal punishment imposed upon him/her; and (b) on September 18, 1996, the Plaintiff was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for non-prosecution.

The plaintiff appealed against the above judgment, but the appellate court was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor of one year and three months, and this judgment became final and conclusive.

C. The plaintiff of the second criminal trial due to an accusation was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and three months at the appellate court of the first criminal trial, and was released from prison on May 29, 1997, but filed a complaint for perjury again with H, B, and E, who was a witness in the said criminal trial.

Ultimately, the Plaintiff was recognized to have reported false facts for the purpose of having the above H, B, and E subject to criminal punishment, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not more than one year on July 6, 1999 in the Ulsan District Court 9DaMa79 decided on July 6, 199, and this judgment became final and conclusive.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and its determination

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is merely a charge of perjury against the witness who made a false statement.

arrow