1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The following facts, which have become final and conclusive in the judgment subject to review, are apparent or apparent to this court.

1) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against G for a loan claim (Ulsan District Court Decision 91Da9544, Ulsan Branch Court Decision 94Da6052, Ulsan Branch Court Decision 94Ga6052), and H testified testified in the above case. 2) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against B (Ulsan District Court Decision 95Da14520, Ulsan Branch Court 95Na6223), and I testified in the above case.

3) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against C and D for a loan claim (Ulsan District Court 91 Ghana9568), and J and K testified in the instant case. 4) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against E and F for a loan claim (Ulsan District Court 90 Ghana1433), and L testified in the instant case.

B. The plaintiff of the first criminal trial due to an accusation filed a complaint for perjury with H, I, J, K, and L, which were testified in each claim for a loan, and was convicted of imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months in Busan District Court’s Ulsan Branch on September 18, 1996.

[Slsan Branch of Busan District Court 96Gohap163, 213, 517, and 1467 (combined)] The plaintiff appealed, but the appellate court was sentenced to imprisonment for a year and three months (the Busan District Court 92No280) and the judgment became final and conclusive.

C. On May 29, 197, the second criminal trial Plaintiff filed a complaint for perjury again with H, B, and E, which testified in criminal proceedings after being released from the maturity of May 29, 1997. This part of the complaint was prosecuted on the ground that it was also false, and was sentenced to a one-year conviction of imprisonment at the Ulsan District Court on July 6, 199 (Ulsan District Court 99Sang79), and the judgment became final and conclusive.

On June 8, 2010, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit for damages and the final decision subject to a judgment for review became final and conclusive based on the waiver of a judge's duty, even though he did not have made a false accusation.