logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2017.11.08 2017고단954
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On June 15, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months in the Daegu District Court for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 23, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, on November 2015, around 03:00, the Defendant purchased a local mental medicine by receiving 3 g of the Mesopha (one philopopon; hereinafter “philopon”) who is a local mental medicine at the front of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government with cash of 500,000 won and delivery of Melopon (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”).

2. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, on February 2, 2016, purchased a local mental medicine by receiving KRW 600,000 in cash from D in the F main toilets located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and two g of phiphones.

3. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, around early April 2016, around 22:00, the Defendant administered a psychotropic drug in a way that had the fluencing volume of the phiphones purchased, such as the Seoul Gangnam-gu Building 601, the Defendant’s residence, and paragraphs (a) and (b) of Article 1.

4. Although the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, on August 8, 2016, at around 22:00, the Defendant administered an I hotel 302, among philophones purchased, such as paragraphs 1(a) and 1(b), in a way that fluencing the fluor into beer.

5. Although the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant: (a) placed in the same date, time, place as referred to in paragraph (d) of Article 1; and (b) placed in the rophones purchased, such as paragraphs 1(a) and 1(b); and (b) used the romatic drugs in such a way as to allow the saidJ to drink the instant beer.

6. Although the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, around August 18, 2016: (a) around 23:00, the Defendant administered the instant I hotel Nos. 302; (b) 1-a-be and 1-ba-bea-bea-bea-bea-bea-bea-bea-bea-bea-be-bea-be-bea-be-bea-

7. Even if the Defendant is not a handler of narcotics, the date and time set forth in paragraph 1(f).

arrow