The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as stated in the judgment of the court below, did not take a bath or assault to the victims, and there was a little vagaz in response to illegal execution of duties or arrest of the victims, and only he was arrested in a limited amount, and was flickly flicks while boarding the patrol vehicle, but the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. The judgment of the court below is erroneous in the misapprehension of the facts.

B. The sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of facts: ① the victims sent from the police to the scene upon receiving the report of the owner of the entertainment shop in this case; the Defendant refused to leave despite the wanting to leave, and the victim F refused to disclose the identity of the victim after asking the victim F, which would bring about the victim F's face toward the victim F's face; the victim F was assaulted while taking the bath, and the victim F was arrested to the police, and subsequently, the victim G was arrested to the effect that "the victim was assaulted by the victim, such as sending the victim G, after the arrest of the police vehicle," and the victim used the victim G to the effect that "H, the owner of the entertainment shop in this case, who was an employee of the police station, was not an employee of the police station, but did not directly make a statement from the police to the court of the court below to the point of the police station."

M also police officers "the defendant is against the police.