1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)

(a) Article 2(1) of the Addenda No. 1 provides that the same light metal structure shall be applied to the real estate listed in the Schedule No.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Although the Defendant was a legally married couple who completed a marriage report with C on June 8, 1990, the Defendant and C were the married couple, the divorce lawsuit was initiated on February 13, 2014 with Kimcheon-gu Family Court Kim 2012rd 4548 (principal lawsuit), 2013rd 1904 (Counterclaim) and the divorce lawsuit was declared on February 13, 2014, and C was declared to pay the Defendant a property division of KRW 123 million and damages for delay thereof. However, upon appeal by the Defendant and C, the appellate court rendered a judgment on September 18, 2014 that the Defendant should pay the Defendant additional property division of KRW 63 million and damages for delay thereof, and became final and conclusive around that time.

[This case’s divorce suit] (B) the Daegu Family Court 2014Reu512 (principal suit), 2014uuuu529 (Counterclaim), hereinafter the above 1 and 2 cases are combined with the case’s divorce lawsuit.

On October 27, 1995, the defendant purchased real estate listed in attached Form 2 (hereinafter “instant land”) and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the defendant on the same day.

C. C with the consent of the Defendant, newly constructed the part of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “each of the instant buildings”). The part of the instant real estate among the instant real estate is referred to as Nadong, and completed the registration of ownership preservation on April 17, 1997 under the name of C, and extended the instant restaurant around October 2005.

In the instant divorce lawsuit, the Defendant filed an application for provisional disposition prohibiting the disposal of the shares of 1/2 of the instant building as the right to claim division of property as the right to be preserved. On November 16, 2012, the court accepted the claim and rendered a provisional disposition order.

(F) On July 1, 2015, the Supreme Court rendered a decision to revoke the above provisional disposition on July 1, 2015.

(G) Daegu Family Court 2015 business group16). e.

The Plaintiff purchased each of the instant buildings from C on December 5, 2013, KRW 220 million, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Plaintiff on December 10, 2013.

F. The defendant is the plaintiff.