1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Basic Facts

On April 24, 1999, the Plaintiff was the husband and wife who completed the marriage report with the Defendant.

On December 24, 2007, the Defendant, along with the Plaintiff on December 24, 2007, engaged in infant care and infant care services under the trade name of “C Child Care Center” in each real estate of

On August 30, 2014, the Defendant filed a divorce and a lawsuit for division of property against the Plaintiff (Seoul Family Court 2014ddan10152). On December 3, 2014, the Plaintiff was sentenced to a judgment on the following: (a) the Plaintiff filed a counterclaim against the Defendant for divorce and solatium (Seoul Family Court 2014ddan1020) on December 3, 2014; and (b) on February 16, 2016, the Defendant and the Plaintiff divorced by means of a counterclaim; (c) the Plaintiff delivers movable property, such as discarded property, to the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant pays to the Plaintiff 35,000,000 won and the amount calculated at the rate of 5% per annum from the day following the date this judgment became final and conclusive to the day of full payment.”

Accordingly, both parties appealed [ Daegu Family Court 2016Reu426, 2016Reu4433 (Counterclaim)] and on July 20, 2017, the division of property in the judgment of the first instance is changed as follows. The Defendant received from the Plaintiff the payment of KRW 208,00,000 from the Plaintiff, and at the same time received from the Plaintiff each of the real estate listed in [Attachment 1] Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5 of [Attachment 1] and 1/2 of the buildings listed in [Attachment 1] and [Attachment 1] No. 2 [Attachment 2] (hereinafter “the building in this case”), respectively, for one-half share of the land in this case and one-half share of the building in this case (hereinafter “the building in this case”). At the same time, the Plaintiff was sentenced by the Defendant to pay KRW 208,000 from the Defendant for property division due to the fixed date of this judgment.”

Accordingly, the Defendant’s appeal (Supreme Court Decision 2017Meu12729, 12736), but on November 24, 2017, the final judgment became final and conclusive on the same day.

【Ground of recognition” has no dispute, including Gap evidence No. 1, hereinafter.