logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.01.20 2015고단6669
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 21, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 500,000 won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court on February 21, 2007, and was sentenced to a fine of 50,000 won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court on June 4, 2010.

A person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act more than twice, as seen above, was driving a B-to-purd vehicle in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.186% from the 3rd Dong community service center in the year-based training 218, Busan, Busan, on September 28, 2015 to the 3rd Dong community service center in the direction of the parking lot for the 3rd Dong community service center in the year-to-si, Busan, 4:00,000, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.186%.

2. On September 28, 2015, at around 02:15, the Defendant: (a) two police officers belonging to the Busan Coastal Police Station Diplomatic Police Station, such as the victim’s circumstance C, etc., who were reported to have driven alcohol by the Defendant on the street in front of the 3-dong community service center, and asked the Defendant about the drinking condition; and (b) the Defendant’s 112 reporter E, the mother of the reporter’s her mother, and the fluor, reported by the fluor; and (c) the fluor of a bit of bitch.

The above victim C who was arrested as a flagrant offender due to a crime of insult, etc. and was investigated against the reporter E after being involved in the police box of Busan Franchisor D, etc., by openly obsoring him as “I see that I am the police, I am the value of the value of the tax base and the value of the tax base and the tax base of the tax base. C well-being

The reporter E and F, who did not do so, expressed his or her desire to openly take a large interest in the space where he or she is a reporter E and F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. The accusation report, the statement report on the circumstances of the driver at home, the request for appraisal of alcohol concentration in the blood, the statement of alcohol content in the blood, and on-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and application of each written judgment;

1. Article 148-2 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime and Article 148-2 (1) of the same Act concerning selective punishment;

arrow