The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and reflects it, the period of business is short, and if the judgment of the court below becomes final and conclusive, the sentence of suspension of execution should be invalidated, and the sentence of imprisonment, the execution of which has been suspended, should be imposed.

B. However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the act of arranging sexual traffic has great social harm, such as the commercialization of women’s sex and harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals; (b) the Defendant has been punished for a violation of the Act on the Prevention of Prostitution, etc.; (c) once and twice the records of punishment for a violation of the Customs and Business Regulation Act; (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the suspension period of execution due to the same kind of crime; and (e) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the suspension period of execution; and (e) other circumstances that are favorable to the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s age, background of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., even if considering the above circumstances favorable to the Defendant, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.