All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the punishment sentenced by the court below to Defendant A (3.5 million won in penalty) and the punishment sentenced to Defendant B (3.0 million won in penalty, additional collection 3.0 million won in penalty) are too uneased and unfair.

2. In light of the fact that the Defendants conspired to commit the crime of arranging sexual traffic, and that there was the history of punishment for the Defendant A to commit the crime of violating the Prevention of Prostitution, etc. Act in 198 and 2000, the possibility of criticism is less than 4 days, and the profits acquired by the Defendants are less than 4 days, and the Defendants’ acquisition is less than ever, and all of the sentencing conditions, including the following: the Defendants’ age, sexual behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence against the Defendants cannot be deemed unfair because the lower court is too small.

Therefore, we cannot accept the prosecutor's unfair argument of sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.