1. The Defendants fall under each of the following subparagraphs: (a) the term “personal purchase price” in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff as the party concerned is a housing reconstruction and rearrangement project association established for the purpose of implementing a housing reconstruction and rearrangement project to remove old and inferior existing structures located in Daegu-gu AD Total 25,700 square meters (hereinafter “instant rearrangement zone”). The Defendants are the owners of each real estate indicated in the column for “owned and occupied real estate” in the attached Table 1 sales contract execution statement, which is a real estate in the instant rearrangement zone.

B. On July 19, 2012, the Plaintiff association obtained authorization for the establishment of the association from the Daegu Head of the Gu, and completed the establishment registration on the same day.

C. (1) The Defendants, including Defendant E, F, G, H, and I, the heir of the network D, possess the pertinent real estate as the owner of each of the instant real estate. (2) Defendant X, Y, Z, AA, AB, and AC, who was withdrawn from the lawsuit, occupy the said real estate after acquiring the said Defendants’ real estate out of each of the instant real estate as a compulsory auction and completing the registration of ownership transfer on October 20, 2015.

3) On November 15, 2012, the Plaintiff issued a peremptory notice to the Defendants, who did not consent to the establishment of the association on November 15, 2012, after obtaining authorization for the establishment of the association, the registration of provisional seizure and provisional registration, etc. are completed as stated in the “registration of restriction on rights” in the list of attached real estate 2. D. The Plaintiff sent a peremptory notice to the Defendants who did not consent to the establishment of the association on November 15, 2012. Among them, the said peremptory notice reached on November 16, 2012, and the Plaintiff did not reply to the Defendants who received the peremptory notice and DoD until the lapse of two months, and the Plaintiff did not reply to the Plaintiff through the instant complaint.