1. The Plaintiff, among the real estate listed in the attached real estate list:

A. Defendant B is KRW 70,66,000 from the Plaintiff.

1. Indication of claim;

A. The Plaintiff is a housing reconstruction association organized for the purpose of implementing a housing reconstruction improvement project (hereinafter “instant project”) on the ground of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H Group 23260 square meters, and on February 11, 2014, the Plaintiff completed the registration of incorporation on February 19, 2014 after obtaining authorization from the head of Eunpyeong-gu from the head of Eunpyeong-gu for the establishment under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”).

B. The deceased owned the real estate listed in the annexed real estate list located within the instant business area. On March 16, 2012, the deceased died, and Defendant B, his spouse, inherited 9/27 shares, and Defendant C and J inherited 6/27 shares, respectively, and Defendant E, D, and F inherited 2/27 shares, respectively.

C. Based on Article 39 of the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings and Article 48 of the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings, the Plaintiff sent a written peremptory notice to the network I to the effect that, on three occasions from December 30, 2014 to February 3, 2015, “from the date of receipt of the written peremptory notice, it shall reply in writing within two months from the date of receipt of the written peremptory notice, and if it is deemed that he/she does not consent to the change of the establishment, or that he/she does not consent to the change of the establishment, he/she shall exercise the right to demand sale under Article 39 of the Urban Improvement Act if he/she does not reply within two months from the date of receipt of the written peremptory notice.” The Plaintiff again sent the said peremptory notice to the Defendants through the delivery of the copy of the written peremptory notice to the effect that the Defendants did not consent to the establishment of the association, thereby exercising their right to demand sale

The defendants were served with a peremptory notice through a duplicate of the complaint of this case and did not reply within two months. The plaintiff and the defendants were deemed to have concluded a trade contract as follows.

The date of service of the complaint by the defendant / the date of conclusion of the contract.