Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2.5 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A was an election campaign member of a F Party G candidate, who was going through E-Gun election in the 6th nationwide and provincial elections held on June 4, 2014. A

On May 29, 2014, the Defendant stated that “A candidate of K-free military council members who participated in the election of members of the E-Gun council from the front of the Chungcheong H H HH center in front of the election of members of the E-Gun council shall report that he/she paid money to any restaurant, and shall file a complaint if he/she is elected.”

B. At around 16:00 on the same day, the Defendant stated that, at the entrance of the Chungcheong L Village, Defendant B, who caused the said I’s election campaign, “at all times, considered the Defendant to give money to the Gunless candidate affiliated with K in the cafeteria at the cafeteria. The Defendant received a letter of confirmation from the quasi-party.”

However, among the candidates for the E-Gun Council members of the E-Gun Council, the defendant selected as the money provider, N did not provide money and valuables to the cafeteria operator.

As a result, the defendant published false facts to be disadvantageous to the candidate for the purpose of preventing N, a candidate for the Eth Assembly members.

2. Defendant B was an election campaign member of the I candidate, who participated in the election of E-Gun Council members in the sixth nationwide City/Si/Gun local election that was implemented on June 4, 2014.

around 10:00 on May 30, 2014, the Defendant stated that “N candidates distributed money and goods at a restaurant on a new wall” to the branch P, Q, and R, at the entrance of the K-Myeon Office located in the Chungcheongbuk O.

However, N, a candidate for the E-Gun Council member designated by the defendant as a money provider, did not provide money and valuables to the cafeteria.

As a result, the defendant published false facts to be disadvantageous to the candidate for the purpose of preventing N, a candidate for the Eth Assembly members.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. A witness B and J in the third protocol of trial.