logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.04.22 2015고합615
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of three years and six months and fine of 50,000,000 won, Defendant B’s imprisonment of one year and fine of 20,000,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was a person who had been working in the F market from July 2010 to June 2014, and Defendant B was an assistant of the F market for the same period as Defendant A’s relative. G is a person who has served as an assistant of the F market for the same period as Defendant A’s relative, and G is a person who has served as an assistant of the F market.

He Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”) was the actual operator of J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “J”) who is the representative contractor of the I Project interest project under the I Project Act, and the situation where the commencement of the above maintenance project is delayed for several months due to the due process of rehabilitation at the court around April 201, 201 when he was faced with the insolvency crisis around February 201. According to the implementation agreement entered into between F viewing and J, the FM had the authority to cancel the designation of the operator of the project or forced transfer of the shares of the construction project, thereby depriving the operator of the right to implement the project and the right to execute the project.

G was intended to accept H facing the foregoing crisis or to operate a construction project with H’s subcontracting, with the intent of having the FF City Mayor maintain the actual business operator of H’s project for the said maintenance work and the representative contractor’s status, with the intent to make a solicitation requesting the payment of subcontracting.

On the other hand, at the time, the Defendants received approximately KRW 400 million illegal political funds from K, etc. in the Gyeonggi Local Police Agency, and were under investigation for violation of the Political Funds Act, and there was a need to appoint a lawyer, but there was no economic time to pay the appointment fee.

Accordingly, Defendant B worked in F City from March 2012 to April 201 of the same year at the election campaign of Defendant A with interest of the head of L management planning headquarters.

M The introduction of M is under preparation to take over H from M, and H continues to perform the I Project. H is also awarded a subcontract.

arrow