1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The parties 1) Defendant B is Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”).

(2) On August 12, 2016, Defendant D entered into a sales service contract with Defendant E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant E”) to carry out the sales agency business of the complex urban housing unit in Seoul Dobong-gu, Seoul.

In the above contract (Article 15), the defendant D agreed to take charge of the sales agency business of the apartment house in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter "the apartment of this case") as follows.

Article 15 (Other)

1. “B (Defendant D)” will also proceed with the parcelling-out agency business of the Yongsan G apartment construction project (YI) in progress at the request of “A (Defendant E).”

2. The commission for sales agency of "I place of business" shall be paid for the first 20 households within two months after the conclusion of a sales agency service contract for sales agency only for the first 20 households, seven million won per household (VAT separate), and except for those, six million won (VAT separate);

3. “I place of business” will enter into a contract for the sale of goods within one week after the date this contract was entered into and take place on the site by August 25, 2016, and the costs other than the above conditions will be agreed upon by “A” and “B”.

4.For matters not specified in this Agreement, "A" and "B" shall be dealt with in consultation.

3) International Asset Trust Co., Ltd. is the executor of the instant apartment, and Defendant E is the contractor of the instant apartment, and Defendant E is the owner of the instant apartment site. In relation to the sale of the instant apartment, Defendant E actually performed the work of exercising the instant apartment site. B. The Plaintiff’s vicarious execution of the instant apartment sale business is the apartment of this case).