1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Defendants asserted that the Plaintiff interfered with the Plaintiff’s vicarious sales of the Suwon-si I and J apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”). Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s 70 households among the unsold housing units of the said apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”) had subsequently concluded a provisional contract for the said 70 households by rescinding the sales price contract. Therefore, the Defendants jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff the amount equivalent to the total cost of KRW 148,043,687 incurred from April 10, 2014 to June 3, 2014 when the re-sale contract was concluded with the Plaintiff, among the total cost of KRW 148,043,687 incurred in the sales agency, from the total cost of KRW 239 to the 239 households, the said 70 households occupied by the said 70 households, equivalent to 29.29%, 4360,076 won, and the Defendants’ 7060,7107 won and the Defendants’ employees corresponding to the above illegal acts.

2. The Plaintiff: (a) was entrusted with the business of selling the instant apartment units on January 6, 2014 by the company operating a sales agency business and a multi-family housing management business; and (b) was entrusted with the business of selling the instant apartment units on the behalf of the company, a trustee company of the instant apartment units, by the Coco asset trust; (c) among the Defendants, who are the occupants of the instant apartment units, the Defendant A, E, and F in collusion with each other, on January 14, 2014; (d) January 15, 2014; (e) January 16, 2014; and (e) January 18, 2014; and (e) obstructed the Plaintiff’s business of selling the instant apartment units by exercising influence, such as infringing upon the sales office; and (e) the Plaintiff’s business of selling the instant apartment units on behalf of the parties to the dispute may not be acknowledged or disputed by the respective parties.

However, the aforementioned evidence and the statements and images of Gap evidence Nos. 7 through 20, 23, and 24 are all together with the defendants other than defendant A, E, and F, to act on behalf of the plaintiff.