The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, due to the summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, the victim of the traffic accident, the degree of injury of the victim of the traffic accident was not more than two months, and the defendant's vehicle was subscribed to liability insurance, and the defendant's vehicle was not subject to punishment at the investigation stage. It is acknowledged that the defendant's vehicle was transferred to another vehicle operated by the defendant, despite the fact that the defendant was not subject to driver's license, the crime of this case is not good to commit the crime of this case without taking necessary measures despite the defendant's gross negligence which invaded the central line, and that the defendant escaped without taking necessary measures, and the defendant committed the crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act on April 25, 2012, the defendant was sentenced to one year of suspended sentence, three years of imprisonment, order to attend education, and order to provide community service, and the defendant's vehicle was not subject to punishment, and the defendant's vehicle was not subject to punishment for the same reason as the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor for the same offense.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not reasonable.