The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is found to have made efforts to recover defaulted checks, such as the confession of the defendant to commit the crime, the degree of injury to the victim of the traffic accident, and the vehicle of the defendant was covered by liability insurance without being more than two weeks, and that the defendant does not want to be punished by the defendant, even though the defendant was unable to collect his/her checks even though he/she did not want to do so, and that the defendant has made efforts to recover defaulted checks by recovering some checks that are not actually recorded in the crime. However, the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed under the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Traffic Accidents, without taking necessary measures despite the defendant's high blood alcohol concentration of 0.249% due to gross negligence, it appears that the defendant escaped without being required to take necessary measures, and that the defendant had been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime and had not been paid again on the date of the crime. The defendant had been sentenced to punishment for the crime of this case under the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Traffic Accidents, even though he/she had been sentenced to punishment for the same offense of this case.