1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant Pyeongtaek-si shall register office of Suwon District Court with respect to each land listed in the separate sheet.

1. Basic facts

A. The land survey division prepared by the shipbuilding general colon and the temporary land survey division prepared by the land survey division in around 1912 is indicated as being subject to the assessment of the Gyeonggi-do 502 square meters of forests and fields (hereinafter “C forest”) and 435 square meters of forests and fields (hereinafter “D forest”) identical to D forest and field (hereinafter “C forest and field”), including C forest and D forest and land.

B. On October 1, 1938, Gyeonggi-do E-ri, Gyeonggi-do E-ri, Gyeonggi-do F-ri, Gyeonggi-do on January 1, 1963, Song-si A-si on July 1, 1981, and Song-si A-si on May 10, 1995, the name of the administrative district was changed to Pyeongtaek-si. The scope of Gyeonggi-do E-ri and the present area of Pyeongtaek-si A-si at the time of the preparation of the Land Survey Book is almost the same.

C. Land division and merger, change of administrative district name, conversion of area, change of land category, etc., C forest land became each land in attached Table 1, and D forest land became each land in attached Table 2 (hereinafter “each of the instant land”) in attached Table 2.

On July 5, 1990, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of Songwon District Court, Songwon District Court, Law No. 31879, which was received on July 5, 1990, and on September 4, 1995, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of Song-si Corporation on the ground that the above owner succeeded to the property, and the registration was completed on September 4, 1995 with respect to the shares of 193/264 out of the land stated in the attached Table No. 1-B of the attached Table No. 1-B. 39477, Dec. 29, 2009.

E. On September 16, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendants with the same content as the instant lawsuit (e.g., cancellation of registration of preservation of ownership, etc. by this Court 2013Da14861). This court constitutes a village community in the form of natural village, not a specific community, which is the name of each land of this case, but a village community in the form of natural village, the name of which is a specific community, and thus, a person who moves from other areas to the said B Ri naturally becomes a member of the said B Ri at the same time as the occupation of the land of this case. According to the evidence, this court