Defendants shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who engages in nuclear aid operation in Scheon-si C. A.

If a person who has obtained permission to install a wastewater discharge facility in violation of the Water Quality and Ecosystem Conservation Act increases wastewater by at least 50 percent, he/she shall obtain permission to change the wastewater discharge facility; however, the defendant, on July 26, 2013, has operated the facility with permission to change the wastewater discharge facility (the date of 19.78 cubic meters/day) at the same place

B. Although the amount of wastewater discharged (84 cubic meters/day) on April 17, 2014 increased by approximately 324/100, it did not obtain a modified license therefor.

B. A person who intends to install a emitting facility of air pollutants in violation of the Clean Air Conservation Act (1) shall report to the competent administrative agency, and even if he/she does not operate the facility using the emitting facility, the Defendant installed the boiler (5t/hr), which is an air pollutants emission facility, at the same workplace without reporting to the competent administrative agency on December 17, 201, and operated the facility using the emitting facility until July 21, 2014.

(2) When a person who has reported the emission facilities of air pollutants installs the relevant emission facilities, he/she shall install air pollution prevention facilities to lower pollutants emitted from the relevant emission facilities below the permissible emission levels, and even if he/she does not install and operate the emission facilities without installing the preventive facilities, the Defendant installed and operated the emission facilities without installing the facilities (150 cubic meters/mination) by absorption, which are preventive facilities, around December 26, 2012, when he/she arbitrarily removed the said preventive facilities, and installed and operated the emission facilities without installing the air pollution prevention facilities from the time to July 21, 2014.

2. Defendant B is a corporation with the objective of pro rata Trade, etc.

The defendant's representative director A violates the above paragraph (1) in relation to the defendant's business at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1).