logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.08.18 2014나2039525
배당이의
Text

1. The Plaintiff’s appeal against Defendant D, E, F, G, H, and I and the appeal against Defendant B, C, J, and K are all dismissed.

2. The plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this part of the basic facts is as follows: (a) each of the “Defendant Tae Tae Development Co., Ltd.” in the 6th sentence of the judgment of the first instance; (b) the “Defendant Co., Ltd.” in the 7th sentence “Defendant Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd.”; and (c) the “Defendant Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd.” in the 7th sentence of the 7th sentence; and (d) the “the same date” in the 8th sentence of the same 8th sentence is the same as the “1. Basic Facts” in the part of the first instance judgment, and thus, they are cited in accordance with

2. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the instant defense is as follows: (a) the judgment of the court of the first instance is the same as the entry of “ judgment on the previous defense on the merits of the second case” in the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the deletion of “the development of ASEAN” under Section 7, Section 10, of the judgment of the court of the first instance.

3. Judgment on the merits

A. Determination as to the claim against Defendant B 1) Although Plaintiff B did not lend money to N, Defendant B issued and received a false promissory note from N, and participated in the instant dividends, the issuance of the said promissory note constitutes a false declaration of agreement and thus is null and void.

B) Defendant B lent to N a total of KRW 400 million from February 13, 1999 to February 29, 200, Defendant B additionally lent KRW 90 million on October 19, 200, KRW 30 million on March 4, 2010, and received a promissory note No. 1.2 billion on March 10, 2008, taking into account the interest, etc. on the principal of the loan, Defendant B received a notarized promissory note No. 4-1, Eul’s evidence No. 1, 107, and 108, respectively, and Defendant B issued KRW 300 million on June 14, 199, KRW 300,000 on March 31, 201, and KRW 300,000 on March 31, 200, respectively.

arrow