A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around March 1, 2013, the Defendant insultingd the victim by openly insulting the victim, stating that “I will drink, spacife, spacife, spacife, spacife, spacife, and spacife, spacife, spacife, and spacife, spacife, spacife, and spacife, spacife, spacife, and spacife, spacif.”

2. At around 23:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender on the front side of the above pharmacy; (b) was on the back seat of the F patrol vehicle; and (c) was able to get in the back seat of the F patrol vehicle, the Defendant damaged the patrol vehicle used by the public office by getting out of the front seat of the A self-driving seat, thereby getting out of the front seat, thereby damaging the repair cost of KRW 25,00.

3. On March 2, 2013, at around 02:15, the Defendant discovered that the said F patrolman is waiting in front of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Northern District G, Seoul, the Defendant obstructed the legitimate performance of public duties concerning police officers’ patrol, by assaulting the police officer’s duty, such as blocking the front of the said patrol vehicle, and blocking the slopeH and assistant I of the D police box aboard the patrol vehicle, who was carrying on the patrol vehicle, “I going to go back to go back, I going to go back to go back, I going to go back to go back. I again, I going to go back to go back.” The Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning police officers’ patrol, by assaulting the police officer’s chief and back seat glass.

4. The Defendant damaged public goods at the same time and place as the above 3.3. paragraph, and damaged the patrol car used by public offices by opening the patrol car at hand, which was kept in line with the lower order of the patrol car, and thereby damaged the Defendant’s repair cost of KRW 45,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of vehicles, data on investigation reports, written estimates for repair, and photographs of loss from patrols;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;