Defendant

A Imprisonment without prison labor for six months and for eight months, respectively.

except that from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, at around 16:20 on December 11, 2018, operated a C Poter freight vehicle and loaded the part, such as the victim E (n, 86 years old), a victim E (n, 86 years old) who was going back of the said cargo vehicle, and driven in front of and rear the said cargo vehicle so that the wheels of other construction vehicles does not vain, at the site of the project to expand access roads (hereinafter “this construction”). Since the road is a village access, Defendant A’s accident should be prevented by checking and proceeding with village residents' passage along the above cargo driving direction during the construction project, but the accident should be prevented in advance. However, Defendant A was caused by negligence in the course of business at a speed of about 5 km in speed at the speed of 5 km in speed without properly examining the rear side of the said cargo vehicle. The victim E (n, 86 years old) who was going back after the said cargo vehicle, was feld by the front, and had the victim and the victim, i.

2. Defendant B

A. In performing the safety management duties at the construction site as an agent at the construction site, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to a traffic accident described in paragraph (1) by negligence, failing to take such measures, by allowing A to engage in molding work, to conduct regular safety education to ensure the safe implementation of the ordinary construction site, and by installing traffic safety facilities and pedestrian temporary reports to prevent pedestrians from passing through the construction site, and by posting signal numbers to inform pedestrians of whether or not pedestrians pass through the construction site.

B. A person violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance as provided by the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, but the Defendant, as a holder of the foregoing cargo vehicle, had A drive the said cargo vehicle at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1..