logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.12.29 2015고합187
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The medical treatment and custody claim of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicle) Defendant and Applicant for Medical Treatment and Custody (hereinafter “Defendant”) are persons engaging in driving D cargo.

At around 10:20 on May 17, 2015, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicles, leading to the road in front of the victim F residential area of the E in Yangyang-si, the Defendant was driving from the original Myeong-dong, Samcjin-gu, Samcjin-ri, the upper Myeong-dong.

At the time, a yellow tree cell work, which is a fenced for the victim's residence, is located in front of the house and is located in front of the sidewalk and the road not divided into the sidewalk and the roadway. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to care to prevent a collision with the victim by properly using steering devices and brakes while driving a motor vehicle, despite the fact that there is a duty of care to care to prevent a collision with the victim, the defendant neglected to do so, while driving a motor vehicle in front of the road and driving a motor vehicle so as not to use the brake system, but rather, by the occupational negligence of taking an X-ray rather than using the brake system in front of the collision with the victim. As such, the part of the motor vehicle's front and front glass part of the above cargo was flickly facing the victim on the road, resulting in injury to the victim, such as the right pelle, which requires treatment for about 12 weeks, and even stopping the victim without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

2. On May 17, 2015, at around 10:20, the Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) operated the instant truck under paragraph (1) that was not covered by mandatory insurance, in the section leading to a scong-scong-scong-scong-scong-scong-scong-scong-scong-scong-scong-scong-scong-scong-s

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness J, K, L and M;

1. Each written diagnosis (F).

arrow