The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., in two years of suspended sentence in four months of imprisonment with prison labor in the case of No. 1 in the market, and four months of imprisonment with prison labor in the case of holding No. 2 in the case of the market) is too unfas

2. The judgment of the defendant not only was sentenced to a suspended sentence due to night building intrusion theft, but also was sentenced to several criminal punishments including the same kind of crime, but also committed each of the crimes in this case. In the case of the second crime in the judgment, it is necessary to sentence a considerable sentence to the defendant when considering the scope of the sentencing guidelines recommendations ( August 2 to June) and the scope of the sentencing guidelines recommendations ( August 1 to June).

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc., even if considering the above circumstances, it cannot be said that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unjustifiable and unreasonable, even if it is considered that the sentence imposed by the Defendant is too unreasonable.

The prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. The prosecutor's appeal of conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.