(영문) 대전지방법원서산지원 2017.11.23 2017가합109

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원서산지원 2017.11.23 2017가합109

손해배상(기)

Text

1. It confirms that the Defendant’s disposition of disqualification for membership against the Plaintiff on January 29, 2016 is invalid.

2. The defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a limited liability company established on August 25, 201 for the purpose of brand call taxi business (hereinafter “Defendant company”).

B. At the time of the incorporation of the Defendant Company, the Plaintiff joined as the head of the headquarters and the head of the center from June 2015 to the head of the center, and each of its directors from July 2015 to the head of the center was dismissed from the position of the head of the center and the head of the center by a resolution of the parking lot chairperson group on January 18, 2016. On January 29, 2016, the Plaintiff was dismissed from office as a director by a resolution of the general meeting of members, and was subject to a disciplinary action to deprive the qualification of the member in the personnel committee held on the same day (hereinafter

C. The main contents of the operating rules and the award rules of the Defendant Company are as follows.

Article 3 (Composition and Operational Method) of the Operating Rules of the Defendant Company's private taxi call "C" among the members of the Defendant Company is a private taxi business operator, and the members of the Cheongnam-do Private taxi Transport Business Association are recruited first among the members of the Cheongnam-si Branch of the Cheongnam-do Passenger Transport Business Association

A "D" among corporate taxies may be admitted only to members belonging to the company.

Article 12 (Executives) For the smooth operation of Defendant Company, the following personnel shall be assigned:

1. Representative: One person;

2. Chief of headquarters: One person;

3. The head of the Center: two persons (one individual taxi and one corporation taxi);

4. Operation committee members: Four private taxis and four corporations and taxies.

5. Auditor: two persons.

6. General affairs: One person under Article 13;

2.(b)The head of the call control center shall exercise overall control over the affairs of the call control center and actively cooperate in the request of the head of the center for cooperation; 3. b) manage the affairs of the call control center and carry out all the tasks, such as education and regulations, for the smooth operation thereof;

Article 10 (Types of Disciplinary Action) The types of disciplinary action against the members of the defendant company are as follows:

1. Warning: The oral warning shall be given in writing, and an explanatory note and an explanatory note shall be submitted;

2. Suspension of an allocation: To suspend a call receipt service for a specified period;

3. Expulsion: Qualifications for members B.

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2015.10.30 2014가합13878

-광주고등법원 (전주) 2018.01.25 2017나11006

-수원지방법원성남지원 2013.09.24 2012가단49376

-창원지방법원 2018.08.16 2018가합50058

-창원지방법원 2018.04.03 2017나56954