The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Around September 2008, the Defendant was aware of the fact that he had been engaged in the work of a wood station for about 40 years prior to 20 years prior to 20 years prior to 30 years prior to 30 years prior to 2008, the Defendant was aware of the fact that he was able to receive money from E with the knowledge of the fact that he would impede the judgment ability or memory part, and then received money from E and kept the documents related to the property right from E, and then acquired the documents. As such, he was aware of the fact that he received the documents related to the property right from E.

1) The Defendant forged a private document under the name of E with the intent to obtain an enforcement title upon receiving an application from the court for a payment order under the name of E, even though he/she had not borrowed money to himself/herself. On September 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) entered the same as, on February 1, 2007, the date on which he/she borrowed the money in full; (b) entered the same as, on February 1, 2005, the date on which he/she paid the interest of 2.5% per month; and (c) puts the stamp in custody of E in the name of E, which was subsequent to the name of E, for the purpose of exercising his/her rights and duties (hereinafter “the instant loan certificate”). Accordingly, the Defendant puts the stamp in the name of E, a private document on the rights and duties.

2) On October 2014, the Defendant forged one copy of the payment angle in the name of H, without any fact that the Defendant lent money to H, she was named as the obligee, and the obligor, and applied for a payment order in the name of H to acquire the title of execution by applying for a payment order in the name of the obligee, the obligor, and the right of execution by using the computer in the place of non-place of the place of payment, and the said amount was regularly borrowed and the due date for payment is as of July 15, 2014. The Defendant entered “H and the obligee EHa” on July 15, 2013, and marked H’s seal kept by H.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant has a copy of the letter of payment in the name of H, a private document concerning rights and obligations (hereinafter “instant letter of payment”).