logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2012.11.30 2012고단6104
위조사문서행사
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around May 2005, the Defendant borrowed KRW 104,923,054 from E from May 2005, and paid part of the debt amounting to KRW 47,11,000, the Defendant was registered as ownership transfer in the name of the Defendant’s wife G on the ground of sale and purchase of KRW 405,923,05.

Accordingly, E asserts that the above trading was false and filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of fraudulent act against D and G, the Defendant had been willing to submit to the court a written confirmation of debt exemption (hereinafter “instant written confirmation”) with a blank marked with the seal imprint affixed to E, which was delegated by E to resolve the dispute with the repair business of factory buildings.

On June 13, 2011, the Defendant submitted a copy of the confirmation document in the name of E to the court staff in the Incheon District Court in the civil department for the father support of Incheon District Court.

However, the above document is confirmed as follows with respect to “written confirmations,” in blanks bearing the seal imprint affixed by E using the computer at the time of the defendant's non-imcilation of the date, with respect to a certificate issued by a notary public (H:05.08.- Promissory Notes:47,11.00; creditor-E/debtor-D, and A);

1.With respect to the amount of obligation under the aforesaid notary public’s certificate (H), you shall be released from liability for discharge to E by themselves;

2.It will not raise any civil or criminal objection to you separately from this case after the end of this case.

On January 2005, the address of the person who confirmed the facts at issue (creditor) was the forged document arbitrarily printed out "I name E in Gyeonggi-do."

Accordingly, the defendant issued a forged certificate to the staff in charge of the court who could not know the name of the forgery and exercised it as if it had been duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of E and J;

1.The complaint, the statement of payment, each content certification, and the vice versa of the Incheon District Court.

arrow