1. The Defendant: KRW 49,116,619 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from June 30, 2014 to September 28, 2016.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On May 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) the construction period from the residents’ representatives’ representatives’ representatives council in Gyeyang-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul; (b) the construction period from June 2, 2014 to the same year;

8. up to 30. 30. The total construction amount was awarded a contract for the rupture repair and the rupture repair of B apartment units with KRW 537,020,000 (hereinafter “instant construction”).

2) From June 2, 2014, the Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant, who received KRW 130,000 per day from the construction site of the instant construction site from around June 2, 2014. On the 30th day of the instant construction site, the Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant. On the 30th day of the instant construction site, the Plaintiff was engaged in a printing work for the outer wall cover of the 17th floor height apartment building and the track repair work, with the safety net (so-called “instant accident”).

3) The Plaintiff suffered damage to the trokes and the trokes during the extreme period between the instant accident No. 1, 11 and 12, due to the instant accident, and thereafter, the Plaintiff was using the trokes from the 11st to the 2nd century. The Plaintiff was using the trokes for the following reasons: (a) the trokes and the trokes damage to the trokes and the trokes; and (b) the trokes damage to the trokes and the trokes; and (c)

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 3, Eul evidence 1 (including able numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), fact inquiry results on the branch offices of the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings as a whole.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant’s assertion 1) as to the recognition of the responsibility for the occurrence of the instant accident and the scope of the responsibility of the parties, the Plaintiff and the Defendant, as follows. The Plaintiff, the Plaintiff and the Defendant, as well as the scope of the liability, show that: (a) the Plaintiff’s assertion is accompanied by the following: (b) the Plaintiff’s outer wall cover and the cream repair work [the Plaintiff, after fixing the door on the rooftop, set the door from the roof to the ground on the roof, loaded on the Rof’s safety net (so-called lac) on the upper roof

hereinafter referred to as “outboard wall work”

Since it is a very dangerous work, it is necessary to instruct work only to the contractor.