1. The Defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties shall enter the Plaintiff in the attached inheritance share table among the 3 square meters (10 square meters) of Sacheon-si C. 3 square meters.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 30, 1964, the Plaintiff was established and operated as a school juristic person established with the lower court established on December 30, 1964, and on March 1, 1967, the Plaintiff established and operated an E High School on several lots, such as Scheon-si D’s land.

B. On August 10, 1962, the deceased F completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of the completion of repayment on February 1, 1960 with respect to the 3 square meters (10 square meters, hereinafter “instant real estate”).

C. On March 1, 1967, the Plaintiff occupied the instant real estate as part of the playground since its establishment.

1) The deceased on December 1, 1990. Pursuant to the former Civil Act (amended by Act No. 4199, Jan. 13, 1990), the deceased on December 1, 1990 H (the deceased’s heir) shares 6/26 shares in each of the deceased G and the Defendant (the appointed party; hereinafter “Defendant”).

I, Appointers I, and J inherited each of the 4/26 shares, Appointers K, and L ( femaless not in the same family register) 1/26 shares, respectively. 2) The net G died on October 26, 201, and the Defendant and the designated parties inherited each of the 6/26 shares of the net G in accordance with the current civil law.

3) Ultimately, as indicated in the separate sheet of inheritance shares, H, as indicated in the separate sheet of inheritance shares, succeeded to shares of 7/26 (6/26/26/1/26), shares of 5/26 (4/26/16/26), shares of the Defendant and the designated parties, K, and L 2/26 (1/26/26) shares of 2/26/3 (1/26) shares. [In a case where there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, 1-2, 2, 3, 3-2, 3-1, 5-1, 5-2, 5-1, 2, 6-2, and 6-1, 6-2, and 5-1, and 6-2 of this court, the results of each inquiry into the case at the time of the death of this court, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of claim, barring any special circumstance, the Plaintiff’s possession of the instant real estate shall be presumed to have been carried out in a peaceful manner by its owner’s intent. Thus, it shall be deemed that the acquisition by prescription was completed on March 1, 1987 after the lapse of 20 years from March 1, 1967, which was the starting date of possession, and thus, the Defendant and the designated parties fall under each of the following items of the attached inheritance shares among the instant real estate.