1. The Defendants, among two parts of W forest land in Scheon-si, on April 2, 201, as to each share indicated in the column of co-ownership in the annexed annexed inheritance shares.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a clan with X 18-year-old damage and the net Z and AA are the members of the Plaintiff.

B. On July 29, 1970, the registration of ownership preservation was completed in the name of the net and AAA with respect to the two parts of W forest land in Sacheon-si (hereinafter “instant real estate”). However, in relation to the payment of taxes around 1990, the Dong and AA affixed a seal on a clan property report stating that nine parcels of land including the instant real estate is a clan property, and the Plaintiff paid the property tax, etc. on the said real estate.

C. On August 16, 1991, the network Z transferred the network AA to Defendant H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, Q, R, T, T, U, and V on the death of Defendant B, C, D, E, E, F, G, and the network AA on March 18, 1995, and the network AA jointly succeeded the network A as shown in the inheritance share sheet.

On April 27, 2017, a copy of the instant claim and the application for modification of cause, stating the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate title trust with respect to the instant real estate, was finally served on the Defendants.

[Ground of recognition] As to Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, M, NA, P, S, U, and V: The judgment by a confession statement (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act) against Defendant L and Q by service by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act), Defendant R and Q: The non-contentious facts, Gap’s 1 through 4 (including each number), and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the title trust relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendants with respect to the instant real estate was terminated on April 27, 2017 by the final service of the copy of the claim of this case and the application for change of cause.

Therefore, the defendants are obligated to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership with respect to each share in the attached inheritance shares in the above real estate.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.