The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant did not assault the victim, such as breathing or pushing the victim’s breath, etc.

2. Determination

A. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, the fact that the Defendant “a defendant dupliced and pushed down the victim’s breath” was sufficiently recognized.

1) The victim stated in the police that "the defendant has interested in the process of resisting that "the defendant would not repair the rainwater when paying the management expenses", and ii) the court below stated that "the defendant has divided his bats into fats and fats on his fats" and stated consistently and specifically as to the defendant's assault facts in the court of the court below. ii) E has consistently and specifically stated in the court of the court below, stating that "the sound in the court of the court below is an office in which the victim is fatd and the defendant was fatd on his fats and fats", and that "the defendant was fatd on his fats and fats in his fats."

3F made a statement in the court of the court below that “I leave the inside room E, and the defendant was taking the victim’s seat,” thereby complying with the above statement of the victim.

B. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.