1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 108,849,983; (b) KRW 68,89,989; and (c) KRW 68,89; and (d) each of them, from June 1, 2017 to June 1, 2018.

1. Basic facts

A. At around 17:00 on June 1, 2017, C, driving a Dhump vehicle owned by it (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) and driving the front road in Jinjin-gu E in Jeonjin-gu in Jeonjin-gu in Jeondong-gu, Seoul, along one lane from the surface of the sand inside the sand market to the surface of the hump of the Jeonjin-gu, the right-hand left-hand road was increased to the left-hand left-hand side as indicated in the separate sheet at the scene of the accident, and the safety zone was installed immediately preceding that.

C While the preceding vehicle was waiting to receive the left-hand turn turn at the left-hand lane, it is not possible to proceed in the future because the first-hand vehicle was set at a one-lane, it passes through a fixed vehicle through the safety zone where entry into the left-hand lane, and does not find any G without permission crossing from the right-hand side of the above road, and it was shocked with the front-hand part of the Defendant vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). G immediately transferred the instant accident to a hospital immediately after the accident, but on June 10, 2017, G died of cerebrovascular.

B. The Plaintiff A is the wife of G (hereinafter “the deceased”), the Plaintiff B is the deceased’s children, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant’s vehicle.

C. C was indicted for violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Death) with respect to the instant accident, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 7 million from the above court on November 28, 2017. During that process, C paid KRW 31 million to the bereaved family members of the deceased.

After the date of the instant accident, the Defendant paid insurance proceeds of KRW 13,264,910 as medical expenses of the Deceased, and KRW 872,60 as repair expenses of the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6 (including each number, hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1 to 5, video and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (1) According to the above recognition of liability, the Defendant, the insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle, barring any special circumstance, is the deceased’s accident of this case.