The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The defendant, who is aware of the summary of the grounds for appeal, is driving in one lane, has not been able to see the victim who is parked in the bus in the middle of a two-lane and has not been able to see the victim, and there is no fact that the defendant has invaded the center line.

The sentencing of the court below's improper sentencing (the sentencing of 3 million won) is too unreasonable.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the argument on the grounds of appeal are as follows. ① A road in which an accident occurred is established with a safety zone to increase one lane to the left-hand side of the driving direction for the internship and left-hand turn on the two-lane road just before crossing the road. According to the photograph taken immediately after the accident in this case, hand-out has been moving toward the right-hand side of the safety zone at the point where the U.S. and the left-hand turn-hand turn-hand turn-out begins. On the road, the road has been driven toward the right-hand side, and the road surface has been protruding down to the right-hand side of the safety zone at the point where the accident occurred. The above trace was observed from the front direction of the city bus to the point where the traffic accident occurred, and the victim started in front of the two-lane road road in front of the front direction of the city bus in front of the court below.