logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.05.30 2017구단17115
공무상 요양 일부 및 추가상병 불승인처분 취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 11, 2016, the Plaintiff asserted that, as a person working for B police station police station police officer in charge of light-based border-based border-based border-based border-based border-based border-based border-based border-based border-based border-based border-based border-based border-based border-based border-based border-based border-based border-based border-based (hereinafter “instant accident”), the Defendant applied for the approval of the medical treatment by asserting that, while conducting safety inspections within B police station-based (i.e., “the instant accident”), the Plaintiff gets off the ammunition box with weight of 33 kms and knenenee, and (ii) the Plaintiff was forced to bucks and bucks into the ammunition box box and bucks (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

B. On October 21, 2016, the Defendant approved the medical care for “satise finites and tensions” among the injury and disease described in the preceding paragraph, and rendered a disposition not to grant medical care on the ground that the “batch finum finites at spine in the 4-5th century,” and “batch finites at spine in the 1,000s.”

C. On November 1, 2016, the Plaintiff applied for the approval of an additional disease against the Defendant on the ground that “Iekne kne kne mae mae sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule on both sides.” On November 7, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to grant an additional disease (hereinafter “instant disposition,” including the disposition not to grant the medical care specified in the preceding paragraph, on the grounds that “Ie kne sul sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sul.”

The plaintiff filed a petition for review against this, but was dismissed.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 5 through 9, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The main point of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the injury and disease of this case.

arrow