Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On May 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for one year for fraud at the Daejeon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 4, 2015.

[2015 Highest 1508] On August 28, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, at the French site, posted a web site, which is a web site for trading smartphone used goods from smartphones, to exchange with the victim, or to contact with the victim with the victim, for a short time.”

However, since the Defendant did not have a rapidly chrode crowdfunding, the Defendant did not have an intent or ability to send the above k2 tamper even if he was to do so from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim and then deceiving the victim, received K2 1,00 won of the market price owned by the victim at the F convenience store in front of the E Library located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon.

[2014 Highest 1607]

1. On September 11, 2014, at around 12:10 on September 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) contacted the victim G with the writing writing to purchase an electronic tobacco on the Internet circuit site to send the electronic tobacco; and (b) made a false statement to the effect that “5,000 won is remitted; (c) however, there was no intention or ability to send the said goods even if the Defendant received the price for the absence of the said goods.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 5,000 won from the victim to the bank account in his own name on the same day.

2. On September 23, 2014, at around 10:45, the Defendant: (a) contacted the victim H, who posted a letter stating that he/she seeks an electronic tobacco on the Internet circuit site, and made a false statement that “I would send an electronic tobacco if you send KRW 40,000.” However, even if he/she did not receive the price due to the absence of the said goods, he/she did not have the intent or ability to send the said goods.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and belongs to it.