logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.31 2015가단183627
건물명도 등
Text

1. The Defendants deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate indicated in the attached list.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3.

Reasons

1. The following facts are acknowledged by the parties to the determination of the cause of the claim or by the purport of the entire pleadings, either A1 to 4, and the entire arguments.

In other words, on August 21, 2014, the Plaintiff leased the instant officetel of KRW 10 million as lease deposit, KRW 1.6 million per month, and the lease period of KRW 1,60,000 per year to the Defendants. The Defendants did not pay two times or more from March 2015.

The Plaintiff terminated the instant lease agreement on the grounds that the Defendants did not pay rent, and notified the Defendants of the instant complaint by serving the notice of the instant complaint.

The lease term of the instant lease was expired at the time of the instant lawsuit.

As long as the instant lease agreement was terminated due to the foregoing circumstances, the Defendants are obligated to deliver the instant officetel to the Plaintiff.

(A) The Defendant’s assertion to the effect that, although the Defendant was in arrears due to economic difficulties, it would be able to pay the difference between late payment and late payment, it would be possible for the Defendant to pay the difference between late payment and late payment. However, this cannot be a legitimate ground for defense against the Plaintiff’s claim, and thus, the Defendant’s claim against the Defendants is rejected.

arrow