logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원군산지원 2014.12.04 2014가합10726
건물명도 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendants deliver to the Plaintiff the subject matter of delivery as stated in the attached Table to the Defendant’s Schedule, and the overdue charge as indicated in the above list.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff leased the subject matter of delivery indicated in the attached list of the Defendant to the Defendants, and delivered the leased object to the Defendants. As the Defendants continuously occupied and used the leased object without delay of not less than three months, the Plaintiff sent a written notification stating the Defendants’ declaration of intent to terminate the lease agreement by content-certified mail on April 1, 2014, on the grounds that the Defendants were in arrears of not less than three years, and thereafter the said written notification reached the Defendants.

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, since each of the lease agreements with the Defendants was terminated upon termination, the Defendants are obligated to deliver the leased object to the Plaintiff and pay the Plaintiff the overdue rent from March 31, 2014 to April 1, 2014, and the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent from April 1, 2014 to the date of delivery of the leased object.

arrow