logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.07.05 2018고단1920
공무집행방해
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be 2,500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay a fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 9, 2018, at around 00:40 on May 0, 2018, the Defendant: (a) asked the police officer assistant D of the Seoul Southern Police Station C police box to ask him/her whether he/she assaultss the Defendant’s wife E and asked him/her to submit an identification card; and (b) asked him/her to submit a identification card on the ground that the police officer D’s chest was bad.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. An investigation report (to attach a DNA campaign and video data to which a slope D is submitted);

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is not sufficient to commit a crime by using violence against a police officer while drunkly under the influence of punishment.

However, the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime, and there is no record of criminal punishment other than the punishment of a fine in 195.

Specific circumstances, such as the degree of exercise of violence, the age, occupation, sex, family relationship, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., and the conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments shall be comprehensively determined as ordered.

arrow