beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant had maintained internal relations between the victim E (n, 47 years of age and 5 years of age) and the victim who had not been contacted with the victim for more than two months, is doubtful that the victim has returned to another male. On June 18, 2013, the defendant found the victim's residence in Busan Western F and became the victim.
The Defendant, along with the victim who was her child in his house, her fly fly fested with the victim who was her child in his house, was accommodated in the “Helel” 312 in Busan Young-gu G.
At around 23:50 on the same day, the Defendant was able to decide whether there is another male in relation to the text message that the Defendant had been the victim, and was able to take the victim's face with "no human being, deader," and the hand room with the victim's face, and let the victim's head head, who was on the bed part of the bed, into the floor, and went back to the floor, and went back to the victim's face, neck, etc.
For this reason, the victim died due to a cause that could not be known around that time.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of the police officer to I;
1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes on site identification, report on results, written autopsy and appraisal, and reply to requests for appraisal;
1. Determination as to the defense counsel’s assertion of criminal facts under Articles 262, 260(1), and 259(1) of the Criminal Act
1. The Defendant, at the time of committing the instant crime, was drunk and was in a state of mental disability.
2. In light of the judgment, the defendant stated that he was breath at the time of the crime of this case during the interrogation of the suspect, but he was not under the influence of alcohol (Evidence No. 123 of the evidence record), the situation at the time of the crime of the police and the prosecutor's office, the transfer of the crime, and the movement after the crime. The defendant does not seem to have the ability to discern things or make decisions due to drinking at the time of the crime of this case. Thus, the above assertion is without merit.
Sentencing.